Rupsa guha biography of williams
Only member data records are displayed. To find your details, click on the 'Search Alumni' button & search.
| #Sl | College Photo | Present Photo | First Name | Middle Name | Last Name | Degree | Department | Passing Year | Hostel 1 | Hostel 2 | Hall | Others | Member Type | Membership Id | City | Country | Affiliation | Organization | Status | Action | Connect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANINDYA | ROY | M.Tech/ME | REST | 2023 | LIFE MEMBER | L/24//R25014 | KOLKATA | INDIA | ACTIVE | |||||||||||
| 2 | INDRANIL | MANDAL | B.Tech -M.Tech(Dual) | CE | 2023 | LIFE MEMBER | L/24/CE/M94855 | PURULIA | INDIA | ACTIVE | |||||||||||
| 3 | RISHAV | CHOUDHURI | B.Tech/BE | EE | 2023 | LIFE MEMBER | L/24/EE/C95271 | INDIA | ACTIVE | ||||||||||||
| 4 | SANJEEV | VERMA | B.Tech/BE | ETC | 1984 | LIFE MEMBER | L/23/ETC/V07255 | CUPERTINO | ACTIVE | ||||||||||||
| 5 | MIHIR | HALDAR | B.Tech/BE | ME | 1977 | LIFE MEMBER | L/23/ME/H31328 | AHMEDABAD | INDIA | ACTIVE | |||||||||||
| 6 | AYAN | NASKAR | M.Tech in CIVIL | CE | 2022 | LIFE MEMBER | L/24/CE/N65188 | INDIA | ACTIVE | ||||||||||||
| 7 | GOPAL | CHANDRA | BAG | B.ARCH | ARCH | 1991 | LIFE MEMBER | L/23/ARCH/B23940 | KOLKATA | INDIA | ACTIVE | ||||||||||
| 8 | AMITAVA | SENGUPTA | B.Arch | ARCH | 1976 | LIFE MEMBER | L/22/ARCH/S85163 | KOLKATA | ACTIVE | ||||||||||||
| 9 | SAIKAT | BAKSHI | Ph.D | 2021 | LIFE MEMBER | L/23/ETC/B62213 | KOLKATA | INDIA | ACTIVE | ||||||||||||
| 10 | AMAN | KUMAR | B.Tech/BE | ETC | 2021 | LIFE MEMBER | L/23/ETC/K81071 | BHAGALPUR | INDIA | ACTIVE | |||||||||||
| 11 | SUDIP | GHOSH | PhD | VLSI | 2017 | LIFE MEMBER | L/018/VLSI/G001 | KOLKATA | INDIA | NULL | ACTIVE | ||||||||||
| 12 | SOUGATA | MAZUMDER | B.Tech-M.Tech | MIN | 2020 | LIFE MEMBER | L/22/MIN/M48510 | KOLKATA | ACTIVE | ||||||||||||
| 13 | AMRITA | GHOSH | B.Tech-M.Tech | EE | 2020 | LIFE MEMBER | L/21/EE/G002099 | KOLKATA | INDIA | ACTIVE | |||||||||||
| 14 | DEBJYOTI | DATTA | B.Tech-M.Tech | EE | 2020 | LIFE MEMBER | L/24/EE/D74564 | KOLKATA | INDIA | ACTIVE | |||||||||||
| 15 | JYOTISHKA | DAS | B.Tech-M.Tech | ETC | 2020 | LIFE MEMBER | L/22/ETC/D95275 | KOLKATA | ACTIVE | ||||||||||||
| 16 | SONU | KUMAR | SHARMA Open Access Peer-reviewed
x AbstractAliyaPulsed Electric Field (PEF) technology is an emerging strategy in the field of cancer treatment, offering a novel approach to ablation therapy that does not rely on thermal mechanisms. By employing a multi-stage experimental setup, including potato tuber, porcine liver, and murine breast cancer models, we explored the dose-response relationship on ablation and immune modulation by varying the pulse packets delivered from 20 to 100. The biologic response observed with 60 packets represented a minimum effective dose yielding reproducible ablation parameters, immune response, and efficacy which could be augmented with immune checkpoint blockade. This pre-clinical analysis provides a first step toward understanding the therapeutic index for PEF technology beyond ablation, a consideration that will require robust clinical validation in well-designed prospective studies. Citation: Nafie EHO, Pastori C, Acharya R, Kaviani R, Hunter D, Shalaby W, et al. (2025) Understanding the aliya pulsed electric field dose-response relationship: Implications for ablation size, thermal load, and immune response in an orthotopic murine breast cancer model. PLoS ONE 20(2): e0318440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318440 Editor: Jie Yang, Sichuan University, CHINA Received: August 13, 2024; Accepted: January 15, 2025; Published: February 13, 2025 Copyright: © 2025 Nafie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, p AbstractAliyaPulsed Electric Field (PEF) technology is an emerging strategy in the field of cancer treatment, offering a novel approach to ablation therapy that does not rely on thermal mechanisms. By employing a multi-stage experimental setup, including potato tuber, porcine liver, and murine breast cancer models, we explored the dose-response relationship on ablation and immune modulation by varying the pulse packets delivered from 20 to 100. The biologic response observed with 60 packets represented a minimum effective dose yielding reproducible ablation parameters, immune response, and efficacy which could be augmented with immune checkpoint blockade. This pre-clinical analysis provides a first step toward understanding the therapeutic index for PEF technology beyond ablation, a consideration that will require robust clinical validation in well-designed prospective studies. IntroductionModern treatments in solid tumor oncology have evolved to incorporate rational dose-response relationships such as dose-dense chemotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to improve patient tolerability while maintaining efficacy [1–3]. Many of these strategies were originally proposed in animal models and later validated through prospective clinical investigation. Like radiotherapy, a number of thermal ablative modalities have been studied with the hope of stimulating systemic immune-mediated or abscopal responses beyond focal tumor ablation [4], where the emphasis has shifted towards potential synergies with systemic treatments. It can be argued that ablation is not a binary event and may reflect dose-dependent parameters. In combination with systemic therapies, complex interdependencies may arise within the tumor microenvironment that rely on the mechanism of cell death and injury response. A promising avenue in the evolution of ablation is the AliyaPulsed Electric Field (PEF) technology. Unlike traditional mo |